Beginning with the Middle Ages, women were considered to be theoretically inferior to men and were to be kept restricted in their male-run households. Chadwicks says, "The confusion of sovereignty with personal property contributed to the emergence of a number of powerful upper-class women at a time when most other women were restricted to the home and economically dependent on fathers, husbands, brothers, or sovereigns" (44). This indicates that sovereignty was considered a male role so with the wave of women coming into powerful and influential positions, society did not know how to handle it properly. Using artist Hildegard of Bingen as an example, she was an influential nun who was able to channel the word of God and transcribe it.
Hildegard of Bingen, Scivais, 1152 The description of Hildegard receiving the word of God |
From the Middle Ages to the Renaissance, there was not a drastic change in treatment of women and the limits of their societal capabilities. The Renaissance consisted of injustices that men would ultimately benefit from, rape for example, was not considered a serious crime as men were able to take whatever they wanted without consequence. In fact, men were able to be absolved for a rape crime by marrying the woman they attacked. Artist Artemisia Gentileschi is an example of this instance happening as she was raped by her father's worker and was then forced to marry him to fix her reputation and absolve him of his crime. Although married, her father still took his daughter's attacker to court where he was then sent to jail for a year and continued to work for her father. The emotions from her attack are found in her art piece "Susanna and the Elders" which was an adaptation of Tintoretto's Susanna and the Elders 55 years prior. The invasiveness of the men upon Susanna in Artemisia's depiction of the story depicts the violation and invasion that she felt herself at the hands of her father's worker.
Artemisia Gentileschi, Susanna and the Elders, 1610 Adapted from Tintoretto's "Susanna and the Elders" in 1555 |
It was not until the 17th and 18th centuries that we begin to see a dynamic shift in the place and influence of women in society. Although women were still not granted the benefit of complete independence and individuality, they surely became more bold in the art pieces they produced and how they asserted themselves. Angelica Kauffman for example, started off creating domestic pieces to get her feet off the ground and sprung into the art world. Once she became established as a serious artist, she then turned over to historic pieces which were not as prominent in the 17th and 18th centuries. The Guerrilla Girls write, "Her financial success freed her to do the history painting that she felt would put her in the major leagues. She had legendary charm and quickly became part of a social group that included the painters Benjamin West and Joshua Reynolds..." (43). This indicates that although being a woman artist, her work spoke for itself and her undeniable talent was impossible to ignore. This solidifies that fact that as time progressed women were not immediately accepted as exceptional artists but they became more present and resilient to rejection that it was nearly impossible to ignore their productions.
Overall, women over the decades have always held talent and power but were kept at bay by society. Women were expected to know their place and remain silent but women artist such as Hildegard of Bingen all the way to Angelica Kauffman have used their artistic talents to break free of the chains placed on them. Unfortunately, after centuries of oppressions women still fight for equality and acceptance but one day we will not be forced to shut our ""big mouths.
Works Cited
Chadwick, Whitney. Women, Art, and Society. , 1990. Print.The Guerrilla Girls' Bedside Companion to the History of Western Art. New York: Penguin Books, 1998. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment